A Niche for Talented Elicitors
If I haven't said it here before, I love the Creating Passionate Users blog. Her ideas are usually formed well, are actually relevant to 'big topics' in business and the philosophy of business and service, and most entries even come with cool litte illustrations and graphics. Some entries are marvelous springboards for additional conversation.
Such is this entry. In it, she talks about how the fast-talking smart-sounding people in meetings can often 'win the crowd' over the slower, deeper thinkers that can't spit out acronyms and corp speak at 300 words per minute. People that need time to articulate their concerns are often right; or at least have really important points to add to the plan.
The end result: the fast talkers get a disproportionate level of credibility, and the folks that take longer to formulate their thoughts are often left out in the cold. This goes beyond kudos or reputation at work as "an ideas person" or "a quick problem solver." The worst part is that half-baked solutions get put into play without deep analysis, costing the company when problems ensue. Hey, problems with the plan is just another chance for the fast-talkers to look smart, right? (read her blog entry)
I think she is right on the button, including her observation that as time lines get shorter in our information age, and companies just want to move fast-faster-faster, this pattern gets amplified.
What I see here is a marvelous opportunity for skilled facilitators to take on more important roles in these kinds of meetings. A trained (and neutral-operating) facilitator can (1) spot the folks that are thinking but not speaking and make space and time for them in the meeting, (2) slow down the fast-talkers with pacing questions, (3) dig deeper into the fast-talkers plan with practical questions that reveal deep concerns and different perspectives of the plan, and (4) ask questions that can help the folks that are formulating their concerns to develop them on speak them on the spot. This isn't a rapid-fire questioning, it is a respectful process that really helps reveal (and manage) all kinds of things.
As all this is going on, the facilitator often also has to be a trainer that shows new participants how the process works, manages their expectations about time issues and round-the-long-way routes that actually get the good answers quicker, and teaches them how to be good participants in the process.
I can see the need now. I can see that people who end up doing this on the fly will start to be recognized and valued for their participation in the meetings. They'll be requested to come and operate in that capacity to more and more meetings. They'll pioneer methods, write books, and maybe get this idea into the mainstream consciousness.
Big-business America is experiencing shrinking profit margins and rising costs - and those two trends will continue to close in on each other in every company that still follows Industrial Age practices.
Maybe someday, there will be positions in companies for professional meeting facilitators that do exactly the above things, plus negotiations and training. Wouldn't that just be too cool?

Help



