Music find: Dave Barnes
Enlightened Fantasy Football Fans Only, please.
Internet Date Book
It has been running less than a year, and already we are seeing "synergistic" benefits that we didn't anticipate. For example, if I am a shop owner or craft event organizer, I can just pull up the main page of the site to see the distribution of craft classes (and their different types) over the month. It is then easy to see that offering a knitting class on Saturday is not a great idea - there are nine of them already. But on Monday! Aha!
If the local shops and class-offering folk were to use this tool to see what has over-saturated and when, the entire area would end up with (a) a much better balance of classes and (b) a much better time-availability for classes - offering them at times that aren't in competition with other events. Result: higher enrollments, better selection of classes, and a schedule that allows more people to participate and attend. The *entire* local crafting economy would be boosted by this. I say that because the craft-class organizers are always complaining of low turnout.
So here we have a tool that brings visbility and easy coordination that just wasn't possible before - as well as additional exposure. This is the kind of thing that the Internet was invented for; this is the virtue of the tool. And this was an unintended side benefit!
Also, it has become clear that we need some kind of standard date-event XML format that works like RSS (or could even be considered to be an RSS feed). This is so dates and events from one site could be machine-read and compiled on another, complete with updates and info. Right now, shop owners have three or four places to enter their class info, repeating it, and not updating (usually) more than one source with changes (which sometimes occur weeks after the original listing). It only takes once or twice for someone to show up to an event that has been cancelled for that person to back off on going to events all around. It's killing the excitement around get-togethers and it is labelling Portland as a town of flakey crafters. Events are getting a reputation as unreliable just because people can't get the word about changes and cancellations.
The amount of work it takes to build one month of calendar on DIY Alert - entering between 300 and 600 events - is big. Much bigger than the amount of revenue the site produces. It doesn't have to be - if we had date-interchange RSS plug-ins for Drupal, Word Press, and a couple of others, then events could be automatically transferred and published all around. Newspaper sites and community sites would be able to present current information *with no labor costs* - creating listings far more complete than what they do now.
Everyone benefits. The publishers still have control over what goes into the feed and what doesn't. And the whole world gets a giant calendar of events of all kinds. How nice it would be for me to wake up on Saturday morning, type "juggling" into an RSS feed search engine, and see what events I could go to this morning, right now, right when I feel like it. It'll increase turn out, excitement, connection, community, and our fun!
The "right" cookies
I've been busy traveling for business, and I'm glad to be back with a thought for today for my Zaadz blog. :)
A conversation:
Abby: "I have two cookie recipes here."
Bob: "Ah. Good. I want to make cookies. Okay, which one is the right one?"
Abby: "The right one? What do you mean? They are both valid recipes."
Bob: "But which one is the *right* one to make cookies?"
Abby: "Er, they are both right. They both make cookies."
Bob: "Well, okay, but which one makes the *right* cookies?"
Abby: ???
Substitute exercise programs, philosophies, psychological methods, or whatever you like for "cookie recipies" in the above conversation and let your mind run the paths. Hmmm.
There are linguistic issues in the above conversation. Depending on the topic, this conversation can typically either (1) continue to have the two speakers missing each other's point of view entirely, or (2) devolve into arguing over which one is, indeed, the *right* one and why. Although the "why's" tend to run into emotional and opinion-based territory.
One way to get a bit farther up the ladder is to change the question. It isn't about which one is better, it's about which one is better for _what_?
Not which is better in general, or all the reasons that one is good and other isn't good in a myriad of situations, but specifically narrow in on the 'what' part. Defining the "what" really adds clarity to things. Some recipes are great for one kind of application, problem, or result. Other are great for different ones. Get your bearings by first asking the other person what the 'what' part is.
Abby: "Better for what?"
And as often as not, they won't know the 'what'. So have them begin there. Once they can speak the what, often the rest comes naturally. And often, you save hours of time because you didn't struggle and conflict over the "comparison without context" problem.
Put simply, don't try to work on the "how" until you know the "what".
Nameste,
--Katin
Pronoia, Shen Ku
o o o
You know, I have moments when it seems more and more obvious that I'm no longer the target demographic for modern music, modern shopping, modern ad campaigns. I *used* to be the primary demographic, see: 18-35 with disposable income. Man, it was like the world was made for me. I'd go to Vegas and they'd be playing my favorite music in every casino with my favorite T-shirts, drinks, food, colors, toys, gadgets... ahhh.
Now that I'm a bit older, those kinds of things don't line up so much anymore. And that's okay. But once in a while there's that fleeting thought that tells me, "you'll never find anything that clicks with you as so totally cool again." As if the mass-marketing added some kind of additional cool. Pshaw.
So it was with much delight that I discovered these two books: they clicked with me to the deepest depths of cool. And, they just 'appeared' in front of me. One jumped off the shelf at the book store, the other showed up on my girlfriend's book shelf.
"PRONOIA" is the opposite of paranoia, and is the title of a new book by Rob Brezsney (the sydicated hip-astrology guy). This book delights and suprises me again and again (I'm not even through reading it yet). Creative, personal, meaningful, helpful, great perspectives, fun and useful vocabulary. It isn't about astrology, it's about discovering how the universe is actually secretly conspiring to bring you happiness. For me, this book is a peek into the future: the seeds of the "star trek" society. Those seeds don't have to grow to be fabulous and have great benefits right now. This books has stories, philosophy, excersises, articles, jokes, and lots of drawings and art. Integral Theory fans will have a ball seeing from all the different perspectives Rob shows readers.
This book is soooo helpful in countering negative thoughts and opening vision to the incredible levels of abundance and blessings that *are us* and *everything* around us, it's amazing. Effortless, gentle and delightful shifting to a peaceful, open optimism. This book is like Rolaids for an ulcer tummy at 2am: aaaahhhhhh. So much better, with a fresh minty tint.
"The Art of Shen Ku" by Zeek is just the handiest, coolest reference I've ever seen. It bills itself as "The Ultimate Traveler's Guide of This Planet," and I agree. It's also the here-to-fore-missing operater's manual for the human body: it has wonderful, simple yet comprehensive pages on health, diet, exercise, acupuncture, and natural remedies. The artwork throughout is fantastic! all hand-drawn by the author. Wow. plus sections on sailing, traveling, defending yourself, sailing, and survival. This is like a Foxfire-Boy-Scout Handbook on steroids, elevated to galatic proportions. Life, The Universe, and Everything, Indeed: we've got Volume #1 of the Intergalactic Encyclopedia right here. Nifty.
Shen Ku is (apparently) the art of placing a whole arena of information on a single page in a way that is artfully organized, easy to use, yet crammed with information. A single-page summary of an entire topic. There's more to the art; I'm still soaking it in and figuring it out; highly interconnected between the four quadrants. Check this book out to see if it clicks with your brain like it did mine. It makes so much sense... why aren't our other reference books constructuced like this? It is so much easier to read, more fun to use, and easier to comprehend.
The shiniest thing about this book is the index: over 15,000 entries. This guy knows how to create an index! Super useful, great organization. I love this book (can you tell?). It' sbeen out since 2000, so I don't know how I missed it for six years, but I'm glad I have it now. If I ever meet Zeek, he's getting an invitation to my grand party along with a hearty handshake of thanks and acknowledgement.
Maybe you'll find these books as delightful as I did. Just in time for reading in the springtime sun... outside, on the deck, where I can meet my neighbors! ;-)
How to meet our neighbors?
Is this a problem for many other folks? If you have met your neighbors, please leave a comment telling me how it happened.
I've lived eight different places in the last couple of decades, and in each place, I didn't know many (or any) of my neighbors. Some of these places were houses, some were apartments.
When I moved into a new place, no one brought cookies or a cake or anything, saying "hello! welcome to the neighborhood." No one even introduced themselves. One man did, he was 70 years old, an HAM radio guy, and the emergency coordinator for our neighborhood (self-appointed). This guy was great; he was clearly from the old school. But he's the only one.
When I moved with my parents to new places (in the 60's & 70's), we had neighbors coming over, introducing themselves, asking if we needed anything, and bringing goodies. PLUS the local Welcome Wagon ladies. Not every neighbor came to meet us, mind you, but more than one in each place did.
Whenever I move, I wonder if I should bake four or five cakes and take them around to my neighbors, saying, "Hey! I just moved in..." but I'm just not brave enough. It seems backward, and I imagine they'd be thinking I'm a kook, because nobody does that. I imagine them saying, "Oh, great, what does this guy want... he's going to invite me to his church next." Knocking on someone's door these days seems to have a real stigma to it. People don't want to be bothered at their homes, people don't have time to talk unless previously scheduled, and people have things to do, TV shows to watch, video games to play, the Internet to type on.
What the heck is going on? I know we don't *need* our neighbors in 2005 in America. We can get everything we need from the store. Heck, all eight neighbors in a cul-de-sac can all have riding lawn mowers thanks to our strong economy. And that's wonderful. But is it really that smart? What are we missing?
Online networks and social networking systems are great, and I love them. But the kinds of exchanges that can happen (thus far) online are limited. Even something as simple as swapping paperback books or DVDs requires postage, wrapping, etc. How can you loan someone your lawn mower / shovel / jumper cables / cup of sugar over the Internet? I can't help my Interent buddy carry his new furniture up the stairs, or feed his cat while he's on vacation, or walk down to the corner store with him to grab a drink on a hot day. I can't juggle or play frisbee or go to the pool with my Internet buddy.
Yet, apparently I can't do any of these things with my neighbors, either, since we all huddle inside our apartments, speculating how everyone else that is hiding out in their apartments must be drug dealers, unibombers, drunks, terrorists, running meth labs, or other seen-it-on-the-news, gee-they-live-next-door-to-you kind of twisted take.
I'm getting really frustrated with the state of community in our cities. Is this just west-coast thing? Is it just a major city thing? Is it just me? Do I just need to shower? Did my goatee really look that scary? Eeeeesh.
A Niche for Talented Elicitors
If I haven't said it here before, I love the Creating Passionate Users blog. Her ideas are usually formed well, are actually relevant to 'big topics' in business and the philosophy of business and service, and most entries even come with cool litte illustrations and graphics. Some entries are marvelous springboards for additional conversation.
Such is this entry. In it, she talks about how the fast-talking smart-sounding people in meetings can often 'win the crowd' over the slower, deeper thinkers that can't spit out acronyms and corp speak at 300 words per minute. People that need time to articulate their concerns are often right; or at least have really important points to add to the plan.
The end result: the fast talkers get a disproportionate level of credibility, and the folks that take longer to formulate their thoughts are often left out in the cold. This goes beyond kudos or reputation at work as "an ideas person" or "a quick problem solver." The worst part is that half-baked solutions get put into play without deep analysis, costing the company when problems ensue. Hey, problems with the plan is just another chance for the fast-talkers to look smart, right? (read her blog entry)
I think she is right on the button, including her observation that as time lines get shorter in our information age, and companies just want to move fast-faster-faster, this pattern gets amplified.
What I see here is a marvelous opportunity for skilled facilitators to take on more important roles in these kinds of meetings. A trained (and neutral-operating) facilitator can (1) spot the folks that are thinking but not speaking and make space and time for them in the meeting, (2) slow down the fast-talkers with pacing questions, (3) dig deeper into the fast-talkers plan with practical questions that reveal deep concerns and different perspectives of the plan, and (4) ask questions that can help the folks that are formulating their concerns to develop them on speak them on the spot. This isn't a rapid-fire questioning, it is a respectful process that really helps reveal (and manage) all kinds of things.
As all this is going on, the facilitator often also has to be a trainer that shows new participants how the process works, manages their expectations about time issues and round-the-long-way routes that actually get the good answers quicker, and teaches them how to be good participants in the process.
I can see the need now. I can see that people who end up doing this on the fly will start to be recognized and valued for their participation in the meetings. They'll be requested to come and operate in that capacity to more and more meetings. They'll pioneer methods, write books, and maybe get this idea into the mainstream consciousness.
Big-business America is experiencing shrinking profit margins and rising costs - and those two trends will continue to close in on each other in every company that still follows Industrial Age practices.
Maybe someday, there will be positions in companies for professional meeting facilitators that do exactly the above things, plus negotiations and training. Wouldn't that just be too cool?
Purity of Domain
I sit back, look at the huge menu of bookmarked web sites, and wonder if I should do some surfing. I think, 'ah, but if I do, I will likely run across negative news, negative stories...' As Steve Martin sang so well, "Oh death and sorrow and murder." Which is the last thing I need right now.
And then this thought comes: I wish there was a web site where I could go and know that I'd only see happy, positive stuff. (I'm sure there are some out there...). A DisneyLand stop on the Internet, "The Happiest Digital Place on Earth." I could use a break. I could use a laugh. If I could just relax into a place that I knew wouldn't tax my brain or tug on my sorrows, it'd be such a welcome place and time. Just for a little while.
So, I find the value in purity of domain: a place that is unbalanced, it is all one thing with no weight in the other. Sure, it's unbalanced. But it adds choice to our day, our week. If we feel like we need a happy boost, we can choose to immerse ourselves in moments and spaces that will support that.
I used to think that any space that doesn't hold both sides, that doesn't acknowledge multiple perspectives, that doesn't support the choice to go light or dark was of lesser value. It was unrealistic. Imbalanced. But now I am reminded that it is good to be able to have the choice to have no choices for a little while. To just let go and be, and still have the rational brain think it's safe.
Now if I could just jump the perspective and have that happen in the whole of life in a Zen kind of way... the world IS DisneyLand, oh if only I could see it...
Nameste.
Quick Juice Tip
The red (called Autumn Reds) is a mix of tomato, red bell pepper, beet spinach, parsley, lettuce, cabbage, apple, grape, grapefruit, and lemon juices. Just like my old juicing days! It tastes great, is good on the blood sugar (for you hypoglycemics and diabetics), and aligns with the food combining table perfectly. Great stuff!
Turns out the company, Kagome, bases their blends on color. I'm not sure of the depths there, but it sure seems to work. I've been drinking the stuff for a month now (about 8 bottles so far), and it has been consistant quality, great tasting, and all-around keen.
A bit of behind-the-scenes discovery: my girlfriend & I went to a Japanese market here in Portland (there is a really big one in Beaverton), and what did we see? A whole line of Kagome drinks, only in Japanese! I suspect the home company is in Japan and has probably been making these kinds of juices for a long while. They seem to be new on the American market, however. I'm glad they are here.
I looked into buying from the cmpany direct, to see if I could get the colors not carried at my local market (white, for one), but no dice. They don't sell to individuals. Maybe if we got a dozen people together and offered to buy five or six cases, we could get a deal and the different flavors. Which reminds me of a friend I had back in San Luis Obispo that would order Tim's Cascade potato chips by the case (before they had good distribution down there), and we could all 'chip in' (har har) for whatever we wanted. Ah, it was a good day when the five-foot high box would arrive via UPS, and we'd all show up and pick up our ten or so bags of those delicious chips. Thanks, Joe!
The Four-Quadrant Agreements, Part 1
A friend of mine has based his spritual journey and development work on something that resonates espcially well for him: the Toltec philosophy and culture. "Life is a dream," and we can lucidly influence our dream/life if we learn how, is the general premise. It is a system of ancient wisdom that has serious depth; I can hardly do it justice in a paragraph.
Probably the highest-visbility book in the Toltec tradition is "The Four Agreements" by Don Miguel Ruiz, a nagual and Toltec Master. The four agreements are simple:
1) Be impeccable with your word
2) Don't take anything personally
3) Don't make assumptions
4) Always do your best
As a linguist, I find expressing any truth or goal in the negative to be counter-productive from a subconscious standpoint, thus, the word "don't" in #2 and #3 kills me. (The quickie on that is: if I tell you, "Don't think of a purple elephant," it's too late! You had to think of it to process the meaning of the sentence. If we really want to eliminate purple elephants from our mind/thoughts/reinforcement, let's think of soaring eagles.)
However, the seeds of truth and beauty in these four agreements is obvious and valuable.
In our Integral Portland group, we study Integral Theory which has the four quadrants. Hey, four agreements, four quadrants: are there, perhaps, four simple statments or agreements that I can make with myself that will keep me pure, aware, and in good integrity in all four quadrants?
I'm still thinking about this and how these would formed. I can see Miguel's agreements as being framed as:
1) what I say / do
2) what I hear / experience
3) what I am missing / assuming
4) performance comparison with what is possible & appropriate
So, with an intial quadrant overlay, we get:
1) Upper-right: exterior-individual. What I put into physical action & vibration.
2) Upper-left: interior-individual: my emotions, experience, symbols, concepts.
3) ? Lower-left: what are my cultural operating assumptions (and personal assumptions, though, so this is also upper-left).
4) ? Lower-right: my performance matched with the social collective, their standards, methods and expectations, but also having to do with my physical actions (upper right)... or is this to be a mechanism for managing internal experience as well (upper left)?
So #3 and #4 are still a bit squishy, but they do land in the zones.
So what would the domains of four pure-quadrant questions be? Hmmm.






